BBC has no right to stick their nose in bloody business that's theirs. The ICRC is concerned that certain game scenarios could lead to a trivialization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, they added. Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need. 2. It even let you control the action with an Uzi-style sub-machine gun bolted to the cabinet. Lemme see my list I got: Animal abuse (we all did the sheep thing Im nit the only one!!! Hangar 13. A well disciplined enemy! Ace Combat players: #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #ace #combat. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? What you won't get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. This is a reminder we also have a Discord server where you can share templates, request them or just have a nice chat, level up and unlock server perks. They can go ahead and give an opinion but at the end of the day, people like me couldn't GAF. So first off, this article is from October of 2013. wowall the other shit to improve upon in our society and the snowflakes choose this topic. No Votes: 18 94.7% Other Votes: . And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. Home article Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Let's start by taking back our Language! We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. IE 11 is not supported. Enjoy the meme 'Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?' uploaded by Bolt93. If you kill an enemy combatant in real life, then t-bag the shit outta his/her face, is that a crime? In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause: Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which are generally recognized as indispensable. Though that's touching on a political debate I'd probably best not fire up on a site like this. ShOuLD GAmers bE aCcOunTaBle foR iN gAmE wAr cRiMeS | Let's Talk War Loch 393 subscribers Subscribe 194 Share 4.9K views 2 years ago Sorry about the gusts of breath, As most of you probs. And importantly it adds: Despite this statement, the ICRC claims it's "not involved in the debate about violence in video games." At least I don't play real world war games. You want grief? Nothing happened in 20w09a but they deserved it. tl;dr all the posts, can't be assed to detail a response to this besides: Have fun watching your game sales tank (HAH?) The failure of modern warfare is that it places way to much value on the lives of civilians. Fun fact: we deliver faster than Amazon. Posts by B-VOLLEYBALL-READY 2015-11-30 15:18:18 [Humor] Zyklon Ben on Social Justice Warriors (drawn for Sargon) . I mean why put your self out online if you have such a weak self image if what someone you may never meet or know could influence your feelings or make you day or even a minute of your day bad , why ? PhantOS. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. Most of the games are a relief to people, a window to be what they want to do, in certain games, these activities are the whole point of the game, lie, kill and win. The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. You know, I could continue to rant on this but I'm going to cut my reply short. If courts were to punish you for virtual crimes, it should be their responsibility to say what you can and what you can't do in the game yet people are charged for crimes in the . Yes that will make games soooo much more enjoyable by inserting nagging fucking lawyers. It stopped short of clarifying quite what these consequences should be, suggesting only that "game scenarios should not reward players for actions that in real life would be considered war crimes." radicalislamgaming 3 feb 2022. Without an -actual- crime, I don't see how anyone could be held accountable for war crimes in this manner. You will not believe how many times I tell to random dudes. (Read 1802 times) Epicduke. Also, zombie games are not included in this, in a zombie game if it twitches it dies! I play Stellaris and in that game I literally enslave, genocide, displace entire species and one of the things I can do is eat them/work them to death. The ICRC says it is now working directly with the developers of modern military simulations and the BBC report contains an interview with Marek Spanel of Bohemia Interactive, creator of the Arma series, who claims the studio's games will now be implementing the suggestions. If nothing else, adding behind-the-scenes political proceedings would increase the realism and imersiveness of war games, making them more fun (to me, anyway). These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. gamers are sub-human. Avance de Crime Boss: RockayCity,Probamos el nuevo shooter cooperativo de Ingame Studios y 505 Games, con un reparto de lujo y algunas ideas bastante atractivas. The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. And it probably helps explain just how . These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. See our privacy policy for more information. Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives; Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated; Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives; Destroying or seizing the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war; Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices; Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123; Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities. Steam Community: Hearts of Iron IV. I was just following orders. Macsiurtain_2019 6 may 2020 605 30 In Operation Wolf, accidentally machine gunning a glitching sprite that vaguely resembled a non-military human could be easily divorced from the reality of armed conflict. The question is, how feasible are the ICRC's aims and will players really take on board the lessons about humanitarian law? Hehe, yea.Sun Tzu would be laughing at all this. I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. As for war crime laws themselves they aren't working terribly well, if the Bush years taught us anything, but that probably a rant for another day. Gamers in their right should play video games however they want it and when they want it. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. This'. Cookie Notice Schadenfreude420 7 oct 2021. The only way I could see games getting more realistic in this type of respect would be to add a sort of PoW feature instead of just busting in a room and killing all the bag guys without any option for them to surrender. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? It involves using at least one more brain cell, and that's always a good thing. It is these sorts of split-second decisions that really suggest something about the complexities of combat. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. 1. What would be the fun if this was ethical? I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. - Mongoose - 10-06-2013 Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) Really!? Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: shootouts often occur in areas where civilians are in the line of fire. That sounds like a really fun video game. After reading what counts as one online, and not counting repeat offences, becase for most it is more than once, and in many cases more than I would be able remember, here is a list of ingame warcrimes I have commited because I am bored; Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention: Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health; Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. Jeezsmdh. We also have an Instagram page, where memes & templates are posted daily! The enemy! Skyrim - Civil War Cyrodiil - No emperor. Or is it only bad if someone mods it so that it takes place in the Middle East instead of NYC? shoot civilian, fail mission the player will usually read these instances in ludic terms.